Srinagar: Critics argue that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s international stance on democracy starkly contrasts with his domestic policies, particularly in India and Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).

According to Kashmir Media Service, despite Modi’s global advocacy against terrorism and for democratic values, his government has faced severe criticism for suppressing dissent and enforcing authoritarian measures within India and IIOJK. Political analysts, speaking anonymously due to fear of retaliation, highlight the use of stringent laws such as the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and Public Safety Act (PSA) to arrest activists, journalists, and political opponents. The controversial revocation of Article 370 in IIOJK in 2019, which led to mass detentions and a communication blackout, is cited as a prime example of these repressive tactics.

Critics also pointed to Modi’s silence on hate crimes and communal violence, particularly against Muslims, as indicative of a tacit endorsement of such actions. They contrast this with his international image, suggesting a dual strategy that projects democratic ideals globally while curtailing them at home.